DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
MX-6ModelAlmera
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
204 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4425 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1310 mmHeight1445 mm
1120 KgWeight1235 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…