DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 626
MazdaMakeMazda
MX-6Model626
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 626
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
204 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 626
4615 mmLength4574 mm
1750 mmWidth1710 mm
1310 mmHeight1430 mm
1120 KgWeight1185 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…