DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 323
MazdaMakeMazda
MX-6Model323
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 323
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
204 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower101 HP
170 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationMazda 323
4615 mmLength4290 mm
1750 mmWidth1705 mm
1310 mmHeight1420 mm
1120 KgWeight1195 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…