DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
MX-6ModelBravo
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
204 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
170 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size185/60R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4025 mm
1750 mmWidth1755 mm
1310 mmHeight1420 mm
1120 KgWeight1145 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…