DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda MX-5 vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-5ModelC30
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
7,6 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
213 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
161 HPPower150 HP
188 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo C30
4020 mmLength4266 mm
1720 mmWidth1782 mm
—Height1447 mm
1090 KgWeight1450 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda MX-5 and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…