2012 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 2.0 (161 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelMX-5
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
9,4 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
0 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower161 HP
350 NmTorque188 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationMazda MX-5
4266 mmLength4020 mm
1782 mmWidth1720 mm
1447 mmHeight—
1450 KgWeight1090 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…