2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda MX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
MX-5
Mazda MX-5 2.0 (161 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
S40ModelMX-5
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-5
9,5 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
0 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower161 HP
350 NmTorque188 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda MX-5
4476 mmLength4020 mm
1770 mmWidth1720 mm
1454 mmHeight—
1498 KgWeight1090 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…