DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda MX-5 vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
MX-5ModelZ3
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationBMW Z3
8,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
208 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
146 HPPower118 HP
168 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption11 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 WTyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationBMW Z3
3975 mmLength4050 mm
1680 mmWidth1740 mm
1220 mmHeight1288 mm
1065 KgWeight1220 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda MX-5 and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…