DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
147ModelMX-5
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
191 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
115 HPPower146 HP
275 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4170 mmLength3975 mm
1729 mmWidth1680 mm
1439 mmHeight1220 mm
1345 KgWeight1065 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…