DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelMX-5
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
160 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
117 HPPower146 HP
160 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3975 mm
1809 mmWidth1680 mm
1708 mmHeight1220 mm
1510 KgWeight1065 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…