DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 1999 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
MX-3ModelScenic
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeMinivan, MPV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
179 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4134 mm
1695 mmWidth1719 mm
1310 mmHeight1675 mm
1040 KgWeight1220 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 1999 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…