DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault 19 vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
19ModelMX-3
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3/5Doors2

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
187 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4162 mmLength4220 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1412 mmHeight1310 mm
965 KgWeight1040 Kg
2544 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault 19 and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…