1999 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.6 (B/CB0D) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda MX-3
RenaultMakeMazda
ClioModelMX-3
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3/5Doors2
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda MX-3
10,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
181 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationMazda MX-3
3773 mmLength4220 mm
1640 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1310 mm
965 KgWeight1040 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…