DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 1999 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
MX-3ModelMX-3
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
179 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4220 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1310 mmHeight1310 mm
1040 KgWeight1040 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 1999 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…