DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
MX-3ModelScenic
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
179 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4168 mm
1695 mmWidth1719 mm
1310 mmHeight1609 mm
1040 KgWeight1105 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…