2000 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.6i (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault Scenic vs 1999 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6 16V (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault Scenic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda MX-3
RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModelMX-3
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda MX-3
13,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
170 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/75 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ScenicSpecificationMazda MX-3
4168 mmLength4220 mm
1719 mmWidth1695 mm
1609 mmHeight1310 mm
1105 KgWeight1040 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Scenic and 1999 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…