DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
MX-3ModelClio
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
179 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength3773 mm
1695 mmWidth1640 mm
1310 mmHeight1417 mm
1040 KgWeight965 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…