DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda MPV vs 2003 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
MPVModelFrontera
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
203 HPPower205 HP
271 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption17 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4680 mm
1830 mmWidth1785 mm
1745 mmHeight1690 mm
1710 KgWeight1785 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda MPV and 2003 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…