DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lexus RX vs 2003 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lexus RXSpecificationMazda MPV
LexusMakeMazda
RXModelMPV
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Lexus RXSpecificationMazda MPV
9,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
201 HPPower203 HP
283 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lexus RXSpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption15 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
13 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Lexus RXSpecificationMazda MPV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lexus RXSpecificationMazda MPV
4580 mmLength4750 mm
1815 mmWidth1830 mm
1660 mmHeight1745 mm
1800 KgWeight1710 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lexus RX and 2003 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…