DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden Frontera vs 2003 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMazda
FronteraModelMPV
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
205 HPPower203 HP
290 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4750 mm
1785 mmWidth1830 mm
1690 mmHeight1745 mm
1785 KgWeight1710 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden Frontera and 2003 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…