DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda MPV vs 2003 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
MPVModelConcorde
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
271 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
15 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength5310 mm
1830 mmWidth1900 mm
1745 mmHeight1420 mm
1710 KgWeight1570 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda MPV and 2003 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…