DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo vs 1990 Mercedes-Benz Cabrio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMercedes-Benz
Eunos CosmoModelCabrio
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCabriolet, Coupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

230 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2616 ccEngine displacement3000 cc
230 HPPower220 HP
294 NmTorque0 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears—
215/60 R15 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4815 mmLength—
1795 mmWidth—
1305 mmHeight—
1510 KgWeight—
2750 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo and 1990 Mercedes-Benz Cabrio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…