DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi Quattro vs 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
QuattroModelEunos Cosmo
1989Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h—
229 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2616 cc
200 HPPower230 HP
270 NmTorque294 Nm
5Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/50 R15Tyre size215/60 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4404 mmLength4815 mm
1723 mmWidth1795 mm
1344 mmHeight1305 mm
1335 KgWeight1510 Kg
2524 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi Quattro and 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…