DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mercedes-Benz Cabrio vs 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeMazda
CabrioModelEunos Cosmo
1990Model year1990
Cabriolet, CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3000 ccEngine displacement2616 cc
220 HPPower230 HP
0 NmTorque294 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size215/60 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4815 mm
—Width1795 mm
—Height1305 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
—Wheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mercedes-Benz Cabrio and 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…