DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Demio vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda DemioSpecificationMazda 3
MazdaMakeMazda
DemioModel3
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda DemioSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
113 HPPower109 HP
140 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda DemioSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda DemioSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda DemioSpecificationMazda 3
3925 mmLength4420 mm
1680 mmWidth1755 mm
1530 mmHeight1465 mm
1100 KgWeight1275 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Demio and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…