DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModelDemio
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower113 HP
240 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size175/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4257 mmLength3925 mm
1751 mmWidth1680 mm
1637 mmHeight1530 mm
1315 KgWeight1100 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…