DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Demio vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
DemioModelXsara
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
113 HPPower109 HP
140 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength4257 mm
1680 mmWidth1751 mm
1530 mmHeight1637 mm
1100 KgWeight1315 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Demio and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…