DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Demio vs 2003 Toyota Raum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
DemioModelRaum
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
113 HPPower94 HP
140 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
175/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength4045 mm
1680 mmWidth1685 mm
1530 mmHeight1535 mm
1100 KgWeight1090 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Demio and 2003 Toyota Raum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…