DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Raum vs 2003 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
RaumModelDemio
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
94 HPPower113 HP
132 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
175/65 R14 STyre size175/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4045 mmLength3925 mm
1685 mmWidth1680 mm
1535 mmHeight1530 mm
1090 KgWeight1100 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Raum and 2003 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…