DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
MeganeModelDemio
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
101 HPPower113 HP
200 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size175/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4209 mmLength3925 mm
1777 mmWidth1680 mm
1458 mmHeight1530 mm
1195 KgWeight1100 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…