DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-9 vs 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CX-9ModelLand Cruiser
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
273 HPPower281 HP
270 NmTorque385 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank87 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5085-5100 mmLength4780 mm
1935 mmWidth1885 mm
1727 mmHeight1845 mm
1964 KgWeight2900 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2015 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…