DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Holden UTE vs 2012 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMazda
UTEModelCX-9
2015Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
245 HPPower273 HP
330 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1899 mmWidth1935 mm
1497 mmHeight1727 mm
1697 KgWeight1964 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Holden UTE and 2012 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…