DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2012 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
Land CruiserModelCX-9
2015Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
281 HPPower273 HP
385 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank76 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4780 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1885 mmWidth1935 mm
1845 mmHeight1727 mm
2900 KgWeight1964 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2012 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…