DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-9 vs 2015 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
CX-9ModelUTE
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
273 HPPower245 HP
270 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank0 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5085-5100 mmLength5055 mm
1935 mmWidth1899 mm
1727 mmHeight1497 mm
1964 KgWeight1697 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2015 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…