DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda CX-9 vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeJeep
CX-9ModelCommander
2011Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
273 HPPower213 HP
270 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank78 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5085-5100 mmLength4787 mm
1935 mmWidth1900 mm
1727 mmHeight1826 mm
1964 KgWeight2080 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…