DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Explorer vs 2011 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
ExplorerModelCX-9
2010Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
212 HPPower273 HP
344 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank76 lt
21,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
15,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1832 mmWidth1935 mm
1814 mmHeight1727 mm
2005 KgWeight1964 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Explorer and 2011 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…