DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda CX-9 vs 2010 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CX-9ModelExplorer
2011Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3998 cc
273 HPPower212 HP
270 NmTorque344 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank85 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption21,4 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption15,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5085-5100 mmLength4813 mm
1935 mmWidth1832 mm
1727 mmHeight1814 mm
1964 KgWeight2005 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2010 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…