DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda CX-9 vs 2003 Acura TL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-9SpecificationAcura TL
MazdaMakeAcura
CX-9ModelTL
2007Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda CX-9SpecificationAcura TL
192 km/hTop speed235 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3210 cc
263 HPPower263 HP
339 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-9SpecificationAcura TL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-9SpecificationAcura TL
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/60R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size215/55 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-9SpecificationAcura TL
5074 mmLength4900 mm
1936 mmWidth1785 mm
1728 mmHeight1425 mm
2064 KgWeight1638 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Acura TL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…