2005 • Toyota
Aristo
Toyota Aristo 3.0 i 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2005Overall Score81.75/100
2005 Toyota Aristo vs 2007 Mazda CX-9 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Mazda
CX-9
Mazda CX-9 3.5 DOHC V6(263Hp) 2007Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-9
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota AristoSpecificationMazda CX-9
ToyotaMakeMazda
AristoModelCX-9
2005Model year2007
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota AristoSpecificationMazda CX-9
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
280 HPPower263 HP
432 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota AristoSpecificationMazda CX-9
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota AristoSpecificationMazda CX-9
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size245/60R18; 245/50 R20
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota AristoSpecificationMazda CX-9
4865 mmLength5074 mm
1800 mmWidth1936 mm
1435 mmHeight1728 mm
1680 KgWeight2064 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2875 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Toyota Aristo and 2007 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…