DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Infiniti FX vs 2007 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

InfinitiMakeMazda
FXModelCX-9
2004Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

221 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
283 HPPower263 HP
366 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank76 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/60 R18Tyre size245/60R18; 245/50 R20
YesABS—

Dimensions

4803 mmLength5074 mm
1925 mmWidth1936 mm
1674 mmHeight1728 mm
1960 KgWeight2064 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Infiniti FX and 2007 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…