DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda CX-9 vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
CX-9ModelConcorde
2007Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

192 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
263 HPPower258 HP
339 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
245/60R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size225/55 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5074 mmLength5310 mm
1936 mmWidth1890 mm
1728 mmHeight1435 mm
2064 KgWeight1690 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda CX-9 and 2004 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…