DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-5 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-5ModelLancer
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank59 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4570 mm
1840 mmWidth1760 mm
1710 mmHeight1505 mm
1315 KgWeight1365 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…