DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota Proace vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
ProaceModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
3Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
170 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
340 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5143 mmLength4555 mm
1895 mmWidth1840 mm
1980 mmHeight1710 mm
1819-1928 KgWeight1315 Kg
3122 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota Proace and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…