DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Optima vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
210 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
196 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4555 mm
1860 mmWidth1840 mm
1465 mmHeight1710 mm
1455 KgWeight1315 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Optima and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…