DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
CX-5ModelCX-5
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
197 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower165 HP
210 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4550 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1710 mmHeight1680 mm
1315 KgWeight1435 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…