DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-5 vs 2016 Ginetta G40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGinetta
CX-5ModelG40
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h5,8 s
197 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
165 HPPower175 HP
210 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/40 R17 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4555 mmLength3748 mm
1840 mmWidth1642 mm
1710 mmHeight1045 mm
1315 KgWeight795 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2016 Ginetta G40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…