2016 • Mazda
CX-3
Mazda CX-3 2.0i (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 2.0 CDTI (135 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-3SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
CX-3ModelCombo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CX-3SpecificationOpel Combo
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
192 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
120 HPPower135 HP
204 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-3SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-3SpecificationOpel Combo
4275 mmLength4390 mm
1765 mmWidth1831 mm
1535 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1155 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Galaxy vs Mazda CX-32016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableFord S-Max vs Mazda CX-32016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableOpel Insignia vs Mazda CX-32016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Tiguan vs Mazda CX-32016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Crown vs Mazda CX-32016 and 2016 model yearsComments are loading…