DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Galaxy vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
GalaxyModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
310 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4848 mmLength4275 mm
1916 mmWidth1765 mm
1747 mmHeight1535 mm
1677 KgWeight1155 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Galaxy and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…