DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mazda CX-3 vs 2018 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
CX-3ModelScenic
2018Model year2018
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
184 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1759 ccEngine displacement1749 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
270 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank53 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4634 mm
1765 mmWidth1866 mm
1535 mmHeight1660/1655 mm
1243-1295 KgWeight1725/1753 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2804 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mazda CX-3 and 2018 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…