DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Holden Barina vs 2018 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMazda
BarinaModelCX-3
2018Model year2018
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1759 cc
116 HPPower115 HP
155 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4275 mm
—Width1765 mm
—Height1535 mm
—Weight1243-1295 Kg
—Wheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Holden Barina and 2018 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…